El Salvador vs Eswatini: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
El Salvador
22.4%
in 2025
Eswatini
22.7%
in 2025
El Salvador rank
146th
Eswatini rank
144th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- El Salvador
- Eswatini
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 22.7% against 22.4% in El Salvador, a difference of 0.3%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Eswatini ahead.
El Salvador ranks 146th and Eswatini ranks 144th of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, El Salvador averaged higher in 1 and Eswatini in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | El Salvador | Eswatini | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6.9% | 20.9% | 14.0% | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 22.1% | 21.1% | 1.1% | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 22.4% | 22.7% | 0.2% | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, El Salvador or Eswatini?
- Eswatini, at 22.7% against 22.4% in El Salvador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between El Salvador and Eswatini?
- 0.3%, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Eswatini?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do El Salvador and Eswatini rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- El Salvador ranks 146th and Eswatini ranks 144th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).