Equatorial Guinea vs French Southern Territories: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas

Equatorial Guinea
100.0%
in 2025
French Southern Territories
100.0%
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
1st
French Southern Territories rank
1st

Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • French Southern Territories
020406080100200020122025

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in French Southern Territories, a difference of 0.0%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and French Southern Territories ranks 1st of 184 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea French Southern Territories Difference Ahead
2000s 100.0% 40.0% 60.0% Equatorial Guinea
2010s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Equatorial Guinea or French Southern Territories?
Equatorial Guinea, at 100.0% against 100.0% in French Southern Territories as of 2025.
What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Equatorial Guinea and French Southern Territories?
0.0%, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and French Southern Territories?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Equatorial Guinea and French Southern Territories rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 1st and French Southern Territories ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs French Southern Territories: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid, drawing on BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-by-protected-areas-of-important-sites-for-mountain-biodiversity/equatorial-guinea/french-southern-territories/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-by-protected-areas-of-important-sites-for-mountain-biodiversity/equatorial-guinea/french-southern-territories/">Equatorial Guinea vs French Southern Territories: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Unit
%
Source
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
184 places, 4,784 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).