Finland vs Liechtenstein: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Finland
97.0%
in 2025
Liechtenstein
98.5%
in 2025
Finland rank
12th
Liechtenstein rank
10th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Finland
- Liechtenstein
How they compare
Liechtenstein currently reports 98.5% against 97.0% in Finland, a difference of 1.5%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Liechtenstein has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 12th and Liechtenstein ranks 10th of 184 countries.
Liechtenstein has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Liechtenstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.3% | 98.5% | 8.2% | Liechtenstein |
| 2010s | 96.9% | 98.5% | 1.6% | Liechtenstein |
| 2020s | 97.0% | 98.5% | 1.5% | Liechtenstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Finland or Liechtenstein?
- Liechtenstein, at 98.5% against 97.0% in Finland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Finland and Liechtenstein?
- 1.5%, with Liechtenstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Liechtenstein?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Liechtenstein rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Finland ranks 12th and Liechtenstein ranks 10th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).