Finland vs Martinique: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Finland
97.0%
in 2025
Martinique
99.4%
in 2025
Finland rank
12th
Martinique rank
9th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Finland
- Martinique
How they compare
Martinique currently reports 99.4% against 97.0% in Finland, a difference of 2.4%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Martinique has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 12th and Martinique ranks 9th of 184 countries.
Martinique has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Martinique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.3% | 97.6% | 7.3% | Martinique |
| 2010s | 96.9% | 99.4% | 2.5% | Martinique |
| 2020s | 97.0% | 99.4% | 2.5% | Martinique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Finland or Martinique?
- Martinique, at 99.4% against 97.0% in Finland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Finland and Martinique?
- 2.4%, with Martinique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Martinique?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Martinique rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Finland ranks 12th and Martinique ranks 9th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).