Finland vs Moldova: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Finland
97.0%
in 2025
Moldova
96.3%
in 2025
Finland rank
12th
Moldova rank
13th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Finland
- Moldova
How they compare
Finland currently reports 97.0% against 96.3% in Moldova, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 12th and Moldova ranks 13th of 184 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.3% | 72.7% | 17.6% | Finland |
| 2010s | 96.9% | 96.3% | 0.6% | Finland |
| 2020s | 97.0% | 96.3% | 0.7% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Finland or Moldova?
- Finland, at 97.0% against 96.3% in Moldova as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Finland and Moldova?
- 0.7%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Moldova?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Finland and Moldova rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Finland ranks 12th and Moldova ranks 13th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC β processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).