Finland vs Moldova: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Finland
96.94
in 2024
Moldova
96.29
in 2024
Finland rank
12th
Moldova rank
13th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Finland
- Moldova
How they compare
Finland currently reports 96.94 against 96.29 in Moldova, a difference of 0.65.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 12th and Moldova ranks 13th of 179 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 90.31 | 80.59 | 9.73 | Finland |
| 2010s | 96.9 | 96.29 | 0.61 | Finland |
| 2020s | 96.94 | 96.29 | 0.65 | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Finland or Moldova?
- Finland, at 96.94 against 96.29 in Moldova as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Finland and Moldova?
- 0.65, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Moldova?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Finland and Moldova rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Finland ranks 12th and Moldova ranks 13th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.