France vs Zimbabwe: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
France
88.52
in 2024
Zimbabwe
87.48
in 2024
France rank
22nd
Zimbabwe rank
24th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- France
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
France currently reports 88.52 against 87.48 in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.04.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
France ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, France averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | France | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.32 | 86.86 | 18.54 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 83.28 | 87.48 | 4.2 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 88.21 | 87.48 | 0.734 | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, France or Zimbabwe?
- France, at 88.52 against 87.48 in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between France and Zimbabwe?
- 1.04, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for France and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do France and Zimbabwe rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- France ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.