French Southern Territories vs Heard Island and McDonald Islands: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas

French Southern Territories
100.0%
in 2025
Heard Island and McDonald Islands
100.0%
in 2025
French Southern Territories rank
1st
Heard Island and McDonald Islands rank
1st

Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time

  • French Southern Territories
  • Heard Island and McDonald Islands
020406080100200020122025

How they compare

French Southern Territories currently reports 100.0% against 100.0% in Heard Island and McDonald Islands, a difference of 0.0%.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Heard Island and McDonald Islands has been ahead every year.

French Southern Territories ranks 1st and Heard Island and McDonald Islands ranks 1st of 184 countries.

Heard Island and McDonald Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade French Southern Territories Heard Island and McDonald Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 40.0% 100.0% 60.0% Heard Island and McDonald Islands
2010s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%
2020s 100.0% 100.0% 0.0%

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, French Southern Territories or Heard Island and McDonald Islands?
French Southern Territories, at 100.0% against 100.0% in Heard Island and McDonald Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between French Southern Territories and Heard Island and McDonald Islands?
0.0%, with French Southern Territories ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for French Southern Territories and Heard Island and McDonald Islands?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do French Southern Territories and Heard Island and McDonald Islands rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
French Southern Territories ranks 1st and Heard Island and McDonald Islands ranks 1st of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

French Southern Territories vs Heard Island and McDonald Islands: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid, drawing on BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-by-protected-areas-of-important-sites-for-mountain-biodiversity/french-southern-territories/heard-island-and-mcdonald-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-by-protected-areas-of-important-sites-for-mountain-biodiversity/french-southern-territories/heard-island-and-mcdonald-islands/">French Southern Territories vs Heard Island and McDonald Islands: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Unit
%
Source
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
184 places, 4,784 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).