Georgia vs Hong Kong, China: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Georgia
56.7%
in 2025
Hong Kong, China
57.0%
in 2025
Georgia rank
80th
Hong Kong, China rank
77th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Georgia
- Hong Kong, China
How they compare
Hong Kong, China currently reports 57.0% against 56.7% in Georgia, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Hong Kong, China has been ahead every year.
Georgia ranks 80th and Hong Kong, China ranks 77th of 184 countries.
Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Hong Kong, China | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.7% | 57.0% | 23.3% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2010s | 48.2% | 57.0% | 8.8% | Hong Kong, China |
| 2020s | 54.4% | 57.0% | 2.6% | Hong Kong, China |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Georgia or Hong Kong, China?
- Hong Kong, China, at 57.0% against 56.7% in Georgia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Georgia and Hong Kong, China?
- 0.3%, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Hong Kong, China?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Hong Kong, China rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Georgia ranks 80th and Hong Kong, China ranks 77th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).