Georgia vs Laos: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Georgia
56.74
in 2024
Laos
56.84
in 2024
Georgia rank
79th
Laos rank
78th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Georgia
- Laos
How they compare
Laos currently reports 56.84 against 56.74 in Georgia, a difference of 0.1.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Laos ahead.
Georgia ranks 79th and Laos ranks 78th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Laos in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Laos | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.76 | 29.73 | 2.02 | Georgia |
| 2010s | 45.32 | 34.39 | 10.93 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 53.18 | 54.72 | 1.54 | Laos |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Georgia or Laos?
- Laos, at 56.84 against 56.74 in Georgia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Georgia and Laos?
- 0.1, with Laos ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Laos?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Georgia and Laos rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Georgia ranks 79th and Laos ranks 78th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.