Georgia vs Serbia: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Georgia
56.7%
in 2025
Serbia
57.1%
in 2025
Georgia rank
80th
Serbia rank
76th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Georgia
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 57.1% against 56.7% in Georgia, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 80th and Serbia ranks 76th of 184 countries.
Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 33.7% | 27.5% | 6.1% | Georgia |
| 2010s | 48.2% | 34.7% | 13.5% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 54.4% | 50.5% | 3.9% | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Georgia or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 57.1% against 56.7% in Georgia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Georgia and Serbia?
- 0.4%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Serbia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Serbia rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Georgia ranks 80th and Serbia ranks 76th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).