Ghana vs Namibia: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Ghana
83.65
in 2024
Namibia
83.9
in 2024
Ghana rank
28th
Namibia rank
27th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Ghana
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 83.9 against 83.65 in Ghana, a difference of 0.25.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Ghana ahead.
Ghana ranks 28th and Namibia ranks 27th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.44 | 57.36 | 22.08 | Ghana |
| 2010s | 83.65 | 82.83 | 0.816 | Ghana |
| 2020s | 83.65 | 83.9 | 0.25 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Ghana or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 83.9 against 83.65 in Ghana as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Ghana and Namibia?
- 0.25, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Namibia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Ghana and Namibia rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Ghana ranks 28th and Namibia ranks 27th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.