Gibraltar vs Pakistan: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Gibraltar
31.6%
in 2025
Pakistan
32.9%
in 2025
Gibraltar rank
128th
Pakistan rank
126th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Gibraltar
- Pakistan
How they compare
Pakistan currently reports 32.9% against 31.6% in Gibraltar, a difference of 1.3%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Gibraltar ahead.
Gibraltar ranks 128th and Pakistan ranks 126th of 184 countries.
Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.5% | 23.1% | 8.4% | Gibraltar |
| 2010s | 31.6% | 27.3% | 4.4% | Gibraltar |
| 2020s | 31.6% | 31.6% | 0.0% | Gibraltar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Gibraltar or Pakistan?
- Pakistan, at 32.9% against 31.6% in Gibraltar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Gibraltar and Pakistan?
- 1.3%, with Pakistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Pakistan?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Gibraltar and Pakistan rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Gibraltar ranks 128th and Pakistan ranks 126th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).