Gibraltar vs Sri Lanka: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Gibraltar
31.65
in 2024
Sri Lanka
30.44
in 2024
Gibraltar rank
125th
Sri Lanka rank
127th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Gibraltar
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Gibraltar currently reports 31.65 against 30.44 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 1.21.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Gibraltar has been ahead every year.
Gibraltar ranks 125th and Sri Lanka ranks 127th of 179 countries.
Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gibraltar | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.59 | 21.67 | 9.91 | Gibraltar |
| 2010s | 31.65 | 30.17 | 1.48 | Gibraltar |
| 2020s | 31.65 | 30.44 | 1.21 | Gibraltar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Gibraltar or Sri Lanka?
- Gibraltar, at 31.65 against 30.44 in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Gibraltar and Sri Lanka?
- 1.21, with Gibraltar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gibraltar and Sri Lanka?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Gibraltar and Sri Lanka rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Gibraltar ranks 125th and Sri Lanka ranks 127th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.