Greece vs Namibia: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Greece
83.18
in 2024
Namibia
83.9
in 2024
Greece rank
29th
Namibia rank
27th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Greece
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 83.9 against 83.18 in Greece, a difference of 0.72.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Namibia ahead.
Greece ranks 29th and Namibia ranks 27th of 179 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 44.8 | 57.36 | 12.56 | Namibia |
| 2010s | 82.56 | 82.83 | 0.273 | Namibia |
| 2020s | 83.18 | 83.9 | 0.72 | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Greece or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 83.9 against 83.18 in Greece as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Greece and Namibia?
- 0.72, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Namibia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Greece and Namibia rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Greece ranks 29th and Namibia ranks 27th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.