Greenland vs Rwanda: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Greenland
30.14
in 2024
Rwanda
30.13
in 2024
Greenland rank
129th
Rwanda rank
130th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Greenland
- Rwanda
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 30.14 against 30.13 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.01.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Greenland ranks 129th and Rwanda ranks 130th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Greenland averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greenland | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.44 | 24.71 | 2.27 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 29.37 | 27.64 | 1.72 | Greenland |
| 2020s | 30.14 | 29.34 | 0.796 | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Greenland or Rwanda?
- Greenland, at 30.14 against 30.13 in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Greenland and Rwanda?
- 0.01, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greenland and Rwanda?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Greenland and Rwanda rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Greenland ranks 129th and Rwanda ranks 130th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.