Grenada vs Malawi: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Grenada
62.8
in 2024
Malawi
61.52
in 2024
Grenada rank
67th
Malawi rank
70th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Grenada
- Malawi
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 62.8 against 61.52 in Malawi, a difference of 1.28.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 67th and Malawi ranks 70th of 179 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.8 | 61.52 | 1.28 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 62.8 | 61.52 | 1.28 | Grenada |
| 2020s | 62.8 | 61.52 | 1.28 | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Grenada or Malawi?
- Grenada, at 62.8 against 61.52 in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Grenada and Malawi?
- 1.28, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Malawi?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Malawi rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Grenada ranks 67th and Malawi ranks 70th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.