Grenada vs Nepal: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Grenada
62.8%
in 2025
Nepal
62.0%
in 2025
Grenada rank
69th
Nepal rank
71st
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Grenada
- Nepal
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 62.8% against 62.0% in Nepal, a difference of 0.8%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Grenada has been ahead every year.
Grenada ranks 69th and Nepal ranks 71st of 184 countries.
Grenada has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.8% | 57.0% | 5.8% | Grenada |
| 2010s | 62.8% | 62.0% | 0.8% | Grenada |
| 2020s | 62.8% | 62.0% | 0.8% | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Grenada or Nepal?
- Grenada, at 62.8% against 62.0% in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Grenada and Nepal?
- 0.8%, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Nepal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Grenada and Nepal rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Grenada ranks 69th and Nepal ranks 71st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC β processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).