Grenada vs Panama: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Grenada
62.8
in 2024
Panama
63.74
in 2024
Grenada rank
67th
Panama rank
64th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Grenada
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 63.74 against 62.8 in Grenada, a difference of 0.94.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 67th and Panama ranks 64th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 62.8 | 59.44 | 3.36 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 62.8 | 62.43 | 0.374 | Grenada |
| 2020s | 62.8 | 63.74 | 0.94 | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Grenada or Panama?
- Panama, at 63.74 against 62.8 in Grenada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Grenada and Panama?
- 0.94, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Panama?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Grenada and Panama rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Grenada ranks 67th and Panama ranks 64th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.