Haiti vs New Zealand: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Haiti
37.1%
in 2025
New Zealand
34.0%
in 2025
Haiti rank
116th
New Zealand rank
123rd
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Haiti
- New Zealand
How they compare
Haiti currently reports 37.1% against 34.0% in New Zealand, a difference of 3.1%.
That makes Haiti's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Haiti ahead.
Haiti ranks 116th and New Zealand ranks 123rd of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Haiti averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Haiti | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 28.1% | 29.3% | 1.2% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 32.8% | 33.5% | 0.6% | New Zealand |
| 2020s | 37.1% | 34.0% | 3.0% | Haiti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Haiti or New Zealand?
- Haiti, at 37.1% against 34.0% in New Zealand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Haiti and New Zealand?
- 3.1%, with Haiti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and New Zealand?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Haiti and New Zealand rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Haiti ranks 116th and New Zealand ranks 123rd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).