Iceland vs Tunisia: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Iceland
40.68
in 2024
Tunisia
42.11
in 2024
Iceland rank
104th
Tunisia rank
101st
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Iceland
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 42.11 against 40.68 in Iceland, a difference of 1.43.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 104th and Tunisia ranks 101st of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.46 | 24.76 | 6.7 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 32.49 | 40.79 | 8.3 | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 39.04 | 42.11 | 3.07 | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Iceland or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 42.11 against 40.68 in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Iceland and Tunisia?
- 1.43, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Tunisia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Tunisia rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Iceland ranks 104th and Tunisia ranks 101st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.