Isle of Man vs Lebanon: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Isle of Man
6.7%
in 2025
Lebanon
7.1%
in 2025
Isle of Man rank
163rd
Lebanon rank
162nd
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Isle of Man
- Lebanon
How they compare
Lebanon currently reports 7.1% against 6.7% in Isle of Man, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Lebanon's figure about 1.1 times Isle of Man's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lebanon ahead.
Isle of Man ranks 163rd and Lebanon ranks 162nd of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Isle of Man averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Isle of Man | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1.4% | 3.0% | 1.6% | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 6.7% | 4.3% | 2.4% | Isle of Man |
| 2020s | 6.7% | 7.1% | 0.4% | Lebanon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Isle of Man or Lebanon?
- Lebanon, at 7.1% against 6.7% in Isle of Man as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Isle of Man and Lebanon?
- 0.4%, with Lebanon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Isle of Man and Lebanon?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Isle of Man and Lebanon rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Isle of Man ranks 163rd and Lebanon ranks 162nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).