Israel vs Rwanda: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Israel
30.42
in 2024
Rwanda
30.13
in 2024
Israel rank
128th
Rwanda rank
130th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Israel
- Rwanda
How they compare
Israel currently reports 30.42 against 30.13 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.29.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Israel ranks 128th and Rwanda ranks 130th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.47 | 24.71 | 2.23 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 28.16 | 27.64 | 0.515 | Israel |
| 2020s | 29.95 | 29.34 | 0.61 | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Israel or Rwanda?
- Israel, at 30.42 against 30.13 in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Israel and Rwanda?
- 0.29, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Rwanda?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Israel and Rwanda rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Israel ranks 128th and Rwanda ranks 130th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.