Israel vs Sri Lanka: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Israel
30.4%
in 2025
Sri Lanka
30.4%
in 2025
Israel rank
132nd
Sri Lanka rank
131st
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Israel
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 30.4% against 30.4% in Israel, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Israel ranks 132nd and Sri Lanka ranks 131st of 184 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Israel averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.5% | 21.8% | 0.6% | Israel |
| 2010s | 28.2% | 30.2% | 2.0% | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 30.0% | 30.4% | 0.4% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Israel or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 30.4% against 30.4% in Israel as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Israel and Sri Lanka?
- 0.0%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Sri Lanka?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Israel and Sri Lanka rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Israel ranks 132nd and Sri Lanka ranks 131st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).