Malawi vs Nepal: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Malawi
61.52
in 2024
Nepal
61.99
in 2024
Malawi rank
70th
Nepal rank
69th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Malawi
- Nepal
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 61.99 against 61.52 in Malawi, a difference of 0.47.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Malawi ahead.
Malawi ranks 70th and Nepal ranks 69th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.52 | 57.04 | 4.48 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 61.52 | 61.99 | 0.47 | Nepal |
| 2020s | 61.52 | 61.99 | 0.47 | Nepal |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Malawi or Nepal?
- Nepal, at 61.99 against 61.52 in Malawi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Malawi and Nepal?
- 0.47, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Nepal?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Nepal rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Malawi ranks 70th and Nepal ranks 69th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.