Malawi vs Sierra Leone: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Malawi
61.52
in 2024
Sierra Leone
60.67
in 2024
Malawi rank
70th
Sierra Leone rank
71st
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Malawi
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 61.52 against 60.67 in Sierra Leone, a difference of 0.85.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 70th and Sierra Leone ranks 71st of 179 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 61.52 | 55.1 | 6.42 | Malawi |
| 2010s | 61.52 | 59.56 | 1.96 | Malawi |
| 2020s | 61.52 | 60.67 | 0.85 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Malawi or Sierra Leone?
- Malawi, at 61.52 against 60.67 in Sierra Leone as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Malawi and Sierra Leone?
- 0.85, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sierra Leone?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Malawi and Sierra Leone rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Malawi ranks 70th and Sierra Leone ranks 71st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.