Malawi vs Saint Lucia: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Malawi
63.4%
in 2025
Saint Lucia
63.0%
in 2025
Malawi rank
66th
Saint Lucia rank
67th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Malawi
- Saint Lucia
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 63.4% against 63.0% in Saint Lucia, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 66th and Saint Lucia ranks 67th of 184 countries.
Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Saint Lucia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63.4% | 58.1% | 5.3% | Malawi |
| 2010s | 63.4% | 63.0% | 0.4% | Malawi |
| 2020s | 63.4% | 63.0% | 0.4% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Malawi or Saint Lucia?
- Malawi, at 63.4% against 63.0% in Saint Lucia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Malawi and Saint Lucia?
- 0.4%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Saint Lucia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Malawi and Saint Lucia rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Malawi ranks 66th and Saint Lucia ranks 67th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).