Mayotte vs Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi

Mayotte
53.42
in 2024
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
33.7
in 2024
Mayotte rank
1st
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha rank
3rd

Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time

  • Mayotte
  • Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
0204060200020122024

How they compare

Mayotte currently reports 53.42 against 33.7 in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 19.72.

That makes Mayotte's figure about 1.6 times Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ahead.

Mayotte ranks 1st and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ranks 3rd of 4 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Mayotte averaged higher in 1 and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mayotte Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Difference Ahead
2000s 8.24 28.57 20.33 Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
2010s 25.63 30.62 4.99 Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
2020s 47.86 33.7 14.16 Mayotte

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Mayotte or Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha?
Mayotte, at 53.42 against 33.7 in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha as of 2024.
What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Mayotte and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha?
19.72, with Mayotte ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mayotte and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Mayotte and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
Mayotte ranks 1st and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ranks 3rd of 4 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mayotte vs Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi. Statizoid, drawing on Our World in Data. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-by-protected-areas-of-important-sites-for-mountain-biodiversity/mayotte/saint-helena/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-by-protected-areas-of-important-sites-for-mountain-biodiversity/mayotte/saint-helena/">Mayotte vs Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
183 places, 4,575 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed