Namibia vs Thailand: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Namibia
83.9%
in 2025
Thailand
85.9%
in 2025
Namibia rank
28th
Thailand rank
26th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Namibia
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 85.9% against 83.9% in Namibia, a difference of 2.0%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 28th and Thailand ranks 26th of 184 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.4% | 81.9% | 24.5% | Thailand |
| 2010s | 82.8% | 85.7% | 2.9% | Thailand |
| 2020s | 83.9% | 85.9% | 2.0% | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Namibia or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 85.9% against 83.9% in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Namibia and Thailand?
- 2.0%, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Thailand?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Namibia and Thailand rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Namibia ranks 28th and Thailand ranks 26th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC β processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).