Namibia vs Zimbabwe: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Namibia
83.9
in 2024
Zimbabwe
87.48
in 2024
Namibia rank
27th
Zimbabwe rank
24th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Namibia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 87.48 against 83.9 in Namibia, a difference of 3.58.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Namibia ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 179 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Namibia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 57.36 | 86.86 | 29.51 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 82.83 | 87.48 | 4.65 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 83.9 | 87.48 | 3.58 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Namibia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 87.48 against 83.9 in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Namibia and Zimbabwe?
- 3.58, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Namibia and Zimbabwe rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Namibia ranks 27th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.