Niger vs Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi

Niger
100
in 2024
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
33.7
in 2024
Niger rank
1st
Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha rank
3rd

Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time

  • Niger
  • Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha
20406080100200020122024

How they compare

Niger currently reports 100 against 33.7 in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha, a difference of 66.3.

That makes Niger's figure about 3.0 times Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.

Niger ranks 1st and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ranks 3rd of 179 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Niger Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha Difference Ahead
2000s 100 28.57 71.43 Niger
2010s 100 30.62 69.38 Niger
2020s 100 33.7 66.3 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Niger or Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha?
Niger, at 100 against 33.7 in Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha as of 2024.
What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Niger and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha?
66.3, with Niger ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Niger and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha?
25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
How do Niger and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
Niger ranks 1st and Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha ranks 3rd of 179 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Niger vs Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi. Statizoid, drawing on Our World in Data. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-by-protected-areas-of-important-sites-for-mountain-biodiversity/niger/saint-helena/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-by-protected-areas-of-important-sites-for-mountain-biodiversity/niger/saint-helena/">Niger vs Saint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da Cunha: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity
Source
Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
183 places, 4,575 data points, 2000–2024
Last refreshed