Oman vs Slovenia: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Oman
77.0%
in 2025
Slovenia
79.6%
in 2025
Oman rank
38th
Slovenia rank
37th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Oman
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 79.6% against 77.0% in Oman, a difference of 2.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Oman ahead.
Oman ranks 38th and Slovenia ranks 37th of 184 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.3% | 53.7% | 40.5% | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 14.2% | 79.5% | 65.3% | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 49.2% | 79.6% | 30.3% | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Oman or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 79.6% against 77.0% in Oman as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Oman and Slovenia?
- 2.6%, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Slovenia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Oman and Slovenia rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Oman ranks 38th and Slovenia ranks 37th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).