Oman vs Uganda: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Oman
77.0%
in 2025
Uganda
76.2%
in 2025
Oman rank
38th
Uganda rank
41st
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Oman
- Uganda
How they compare
Oman currently reports 77.0% against 76.2% in Uganda, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uganda ahead.
Oman ranks 38th and Uganda ranks 41st of 184 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Oman | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 13.3% | 76.2% | 62.9% | Uganda |
| 2010s | 14.2% | 76.2% | 62.0% | Uganda |
| 2020s | 49.2% | 76.2% | 27.0% | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Oman or Uganda?
- Oman, at 77.0% against 76.2% in Uganda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Oman and Uganda?
- 0.8%, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Oman and Uganda?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Oman and Uganda rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Oman ranks 38th and Uganda ranks 41st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC β processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).