Panama vs Zambia: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Panama
63.74
in 2024
Zambia
65.29
in 2024
Panama rank
64th
Zambia rank
62nd
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Panama
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 65.29 against 63.74 in Panama, a difference of 1.55.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 64th and Zambia ranks 62nd of 179 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 59.44 | 65.29 | 5.85 | Zambia |
| 2010s | 62.43 | 65.29 | 2.86 | Zambia |
| 2020s | 63.74 | 65.29 | 1.55 | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Panama or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 65.29 against 63.74 in Panama as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Panama and Zambia?
- 1.55, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Zambia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Panama and Zambia rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Panama ranks 64th and Zambia ranks 62nd of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.