Poland vs Reunion: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Poland
94.3%
in 2025
Reunion
91.7%
in 2025
Poland rank
14th
Reunion rank
16th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Poland
- Reunion
How they compare
Poland currently reports 94.3% against 91.7% in Reunion, a difference of 2.6%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 14th and Reunion ranks 16th of 184 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Reunion | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.3% | 29.9% | 49.4% | Poland |
| 2010s | 92.8% | 91.7% | 1.0% | Poland |
| 2020s | 93.8% | 91.7% | 2.1% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Poland or Reunion?
- Poland, at 94.3% against 91.7% in Reunion as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Poland and Reunion?
- 2.6%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Reunion?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Poland and Reunion rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Poland ranks 14th and Reunion ranks 16th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC β processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).