Poland vs Réunion: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Poland
94.3
in 2024
Réunion
91.73
in 2024
Poland rank
14th
Réunion rank
16th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Poland
- Réunion
How they compare
Poland currently reports 94.3 against 91.73 in Réunion, a difference of 2.57.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Poland ahead.
Poland ranks 14th and Réunion ranks 16th of 179 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Réunion | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.59 | 29.87 | 49.72 | Poland |
| 2010s | 93.83 | 91.73 | 2.1 | Poland |
| 2020s | 94.3 | 91.73 | 2.57 | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Poland or Réunion?
- Poland, at 94.3 against 91.73 in Réunion as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Poland and Réunion?
- 2.57, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Réunion?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Poland and Réunion rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Poland ranks 14th and Réunion ranks 16th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.