Romania vs Sweden: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Romania
80.75
in 2024
Sweden
77.06
in 2024
Romania rank
34th
Sweden rank
37th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Romania
- Sweden
How they compare
Romania currently reports 80.75 against 77.06 in Sweden, a difference of 3.69.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sweden ahead.
Romania ranks 34th and Sweden ranks 37th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.41 | 75.78 | 35.37 | Sweden |
| 2010s | 78.84 | 76.18 | 2.66 | Romania |
| 2020s | 80.64 | 77.06 | 3.58 | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Romania or Sweden?
- Romania, at 80.75 against 77.06 in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Romania and Sweden?
- 3.69, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Sweden?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Romania and Sweden rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Romania ranks 34th and Sweden ranks 37th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.