Romania vs Togo: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Romania
80.8%
in 2025
Togo
81.5%
in 2025
Romania rank
34th
Togo rank
32nd
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Romania
- Togo
How they compare
Togo currently reports 81.5% against 80.8% in Romania, a difference of 0.7%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Togo has been ahead every year.
Romania ranks 34th and Togo ranks 32nd of 184 countries.
Togo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 40.5% | 81.5% | 41.0% | Togo |
| 2010s | 78.9% | 81.5% | 2.7% | Togo |
| 2020s | 80.7% | 81.5% | 0.9% | Togo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Romania or Togo?
- Togo, at 81.5% against 80.8% in Romania as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Romania and Togo?
- 0.7%, with Togo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Togo?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Romania and Togo rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Romania ranks 34th and Togo ranks 32nd of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC β processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).