Rwanda vs Sri Lanka: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Rwanda
30.13
in 2024
Sri Lanka
30.44
in 2024
Rwanda rank
130th
Sri Lanka rank
127th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Rwanda
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 30.44 against 30.13 in Rwanda, a difference of 0.31.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.
Rwanda ranks 130th and Sri Lanka ranks 127th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Rwanda averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.71 | 21.67 | 3.03 | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 27.64 | 30.17 | 2.53 | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 29.34 | 30.44 | 1.1 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Rwanda or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 30.44 against 30.13 in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 0.31, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Sri Lanka?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Sri Lanka rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Rwanda ranks 130th and Sri Lanka ranks 127th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.