Samoa vs Suriname: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Samoa
35.66
in 2024
Suriname
34.91
in 2024
Samoa rank
115th
Suriname rank
117th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Samoa
- Suriname
How they compare
Samoa currently reports 35.66 against 34.91 in Suriname, a difference of 0.75.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Suriname ahead.
Samoa ranks 115th and Suriname ranks 117th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.33 | 34.91 | 5.58 | Suriname |
| 2010s | 35.63 | 34.91 | 0.718 | Samoa |
| 2020s | 35.66 | 34.91 | 0.75 | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Samoa or Suriname?
- Samoa, at 35.66 against 34.91 in Suriname as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Samoa and Suriname?
- 0.75, with Samoa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Suriname?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Samoa and Suriname rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Samoa ranks 115th and Suriname ranks 117th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.