Samoa vs Switzerland: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Samoa
35.66
in 2024
Switzerland
35.73
in 2024
Samoa rank
115th
Switzerland rank
114th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Samoa
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 35.73 against 35.66 in Samoa, a difference of 0.07.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Switzerland ahead.
Samoa ranks 115th and Switzerland ranks 114th of 179 countries.
Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.33 | 26.68 | 2.65 | Samoa |
| 2010s | 35.63 | 33.02 | 2.61 | Samoa |
| 2020s | 35.66 | 34.51 | 1.15 | Samoa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Samoa or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 35.73 against 35.66 in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Samoa and Switzerland?
- 0.07, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Switzerland?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Samoa and Switzerland rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Samoa ranks 115th and Switzerland ranks 114th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.