Samoa vs Uzbekistan: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Samoa
35.66
in 2024
Uzbekistan
36.88
in 2024
Samoa rank
115th
Uzbekistan rank
112th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Samoa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 36.88 against 35.66 in Samoa, a difference of 1.22.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Samoa ranks 115th and Uzbekistan ranks 112th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 29.33 | 29.3 | 0.029 | Samoa |
| 2010s | 35.63 | 31.88 | 3.75 | Samoa |
| 2020s | 35.66 | 36.88 | 1.22 | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Samoa or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 36.88 against 35.66 in Samoa as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Samoa and Uzbekistan?
- 1.22, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Uzbekistan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Samoa and Uzbekistan rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Samoa ranks 115th and Uzbekistan ranks 112th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.