Saint Lucia vs Zambia: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Saint Lucia
63.0%
in 2025
Zambia
65.3%
in 2025
Saint Lucia rank
67th
Zambia rank
61st
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Saint Lucia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 65.3% against 63.0% in Saint Lucia, a difference of 2.3%.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.
Saint Lucia ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 61st of 184 countries.
Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saint Lucia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 58.1% | 65.3% | 7.2% | Zambia |
| 2010s | 63.0% | 65.3% | 2.3% | Zambia |
| 2020s | 63.0% | 65.3% | 2.3% | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Saint Lucia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 65.3% against 63.0% in Saint Lucia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Saint Lucia and Zambia?
- 2.3%, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Saint Lucia and Zambia rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Saint Lucia ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 61st of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).