Svalbard and Jan Mayen vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas

Svalbard and Jan Mayen
88.6%
in 2025
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
90.2%
in 2025
Svalbard and Jan Mayen rank
22nd
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
20th

Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time

  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
020406080100200020122025

How they compare

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 90.2% against 88.6% in Svalbard and Jan Mayen, a difference of 1.6%.

Across all 26 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.

Svalbard and Jan Mayen ranks 22nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 20th of 184 countries.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Svalbard and Jan Mayen United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2000s 18.9% 89.2% 70.3% United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2010s 69.4% 90.2% 20.8% United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2020s 86.4% 90.2% 3.8% United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Svalbard and Jan Mayen or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 90.2% against 88.6% in Svalbard and Jan Mayen as of 2025.
What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Svalbard and Jan Mayen and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
1.6%, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Svalbard and Jan Mayen and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Svalbard and Jan Mayen and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
Svalbard and Jan Mayen ranks 22nd and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 20th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Svalbard and Jan Mayen vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid, drawing on BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-by-protected-areas-of-important-sites-for-mountain-biodiversity/svalbard-and-jan-mayen/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-by-protected-areas-of-important-sites-for-mountain-biodiversity/svalbard-and-jan-mayen/united-kingdom/">Svalbard and Jan Mayen vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Unit
%
Source
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
184 places, 4,784 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).