Svalbard and Jan Mayen vs Zimbabwe: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas

Svalbard and Jan Mayen
88.6%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
87.5%
in 2025
Svalbard and Jan Mayen rank
22nd
Zimbabwe rank
24th

Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time

  • Svalbard and Jan Mayen
  • Zimbabwe
020406080200020122025

How they compare

Svalbard and Jan Mayen currently reports 88.6% against 87.5% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 1.1%.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Svalbard and Jan Mayen ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 184 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Svalbard and Jan Mayen Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 18.9% 85.9% 67.0% Zimbabwe
2010s 69.4% 87.5% 18.1% Zimbabwe
2020s 86.4% 87.5% 1.1% Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Svalbard and Jan Mayen or Zimbabwe?
Svalbard and Jan Mayen, at 88.6% against 87.5% in Zimbabwe as of 2025.
What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Svalbard and Jan Mayen and Zimbabwe?
1.1%, with Svalbard and Jan Mayen ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Svalbard and Jan Mayen and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
How do Svalbard and Jan Mayen and Zimbabwe rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
Svalbard and Jan Mayen ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 184 countries.
Where does this data come from?
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Svalbard and Jan Mayen vs Zimbabwe: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid, drawing on BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-by-protected-areas-of-important-sites-for-mountain-biodiversity/svalbard-and-jan-mayen/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/coverage-by-protected-areas-of-important-sites-for-mountain-biodiversity/svalbard-and-jan-mayen/zimbabwe/">Svalbard and Jan Mayen vs Zimbabwe: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Unit
%
Source
BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
184 places, 4,784 data points, 2000–2025
Last refreshed

Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).