Thailand vs Zimbabwe: Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas
Thailand
85.9%
in 2025
Zimbabwe
87.5%
in 2025
Thailand rank
26th
Zimbabwe rank
24th
Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas over time
- Thailand
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 87.5% against 85.9% in Thailand, a difference of 1.6%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Thailand ahead.
Thailand ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 184 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Thailand | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.9% | 85.9% | 4.0% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 85.7% | 87.5% | 1.8% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 85.9% | 87.5% | 1.6% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas, Thailand or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 87.5% against 85.9% in Thailand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas between Thailand and Zimbabwe?
- 1.6%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Thailand and Zimbabwe rank globally for protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas?
- Thailand ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 184 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- BirdLife International, IUCN and UNEP-WCMC – processed by Our World in Data, published as Protected area coverage of mountain key biodiversity areas. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average proportion of Mountain Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs) covered by protected areas (%).