Thailand vs Zimbabwe: Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi
Thailand
85.9
in 2024
Zimbabwe
87.48
in 2024
Thailand rank
26th
Zimbabwe rank
24th
Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi over time
- Thailand
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 87.48 against 85.9 in Thailand, a difference of 1.58.
Across all 25 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Thailand ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 179 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Thailand | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 81.89 | 86.86 | 4.97 | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 85.71 | 87.48 | 1.77 | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 85.86 | 87.48 | 1.62 | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi, Thailand or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 87.48 against 85.9 in Thailand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi between Thailand and Zimbabwe?
- 1.58, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Thailand and Zimbabwe?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Thailand and Zimbabwe rank globally for coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversi?
- Thailand ranks 26th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Coverage by protected areas of important sites for mountain biodiversity. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.