Côte d'Ivoire vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value Standard Local Currency

Côte d'Ivoire
120,017 million SLC
in 2021
United Republic of Tanzania
1.53 million million SLC
in 2020
Côte d'Ivoire rank
1st
United Republic of Tanzania rank
1st

Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value Standard Local Currency over time

  • Côte d'Ivoire
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0500.0k1.0M1.5M199120062021

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 1.53 million million SLC against 120,017 million SLC in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 1.41 million million SLC.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 12.7 times Côte d'Ivoire's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 1st of 1 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Côte d'Ivoire United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 55,605 million SLC 764,232 million SLC 708,626 million SLC United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 136,334 million SLC 1.18 million million SLC 1.04 million million SLC United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 144,778 million SLC 1.53 million million SLC 1.38 million million SLC United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture and forestry — value standard local currency, Côte d'Ivoire or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 1.53 million million SLC against 120,017 million SLC in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2020.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture and forestry — value standard local currency between Côte d'Ivoire and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.41 million million SLC, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and United Republic of Tanzania?
14 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
How do Côte d'Ivoire and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for credit to agriculture and forestry — value standard local currency?
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 1st and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 1st of 1 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Côte d'Ivoire vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-and-forestry-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/cote-d-ivoire-3/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-and-forestry-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/cote-d-ivoire-3/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Côte d'Ivoire vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value Standard Local Currency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
27 places, 558 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.