Nepal vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value Standard Local Currency

Nepal
215,334 million SLC
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania
1.53 million million SLC
in 2020
Nepal rank
4th
United Republic of Tanzania rank
1st

Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value Standard Local Currency over time

  • Nepal
  • United Republic of Tanzania
0500.0k1.0M1.5M200620152024

How they compare

United Republic of Tanzania currently reports 1.53 million million SLC against 215,334 million SLC in Nepal, a difference of 1.31 million million SLC.

That makes United Republic of Tanzania's figure about 7.1 times Nepal's.

Across all 12 years both countries report, United Republic of Tanzania has been ahead every year.

Nepal ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 1st of 25 countries.

United Republic of Tanzania has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nepal United Republic of Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 22,016 million SLC 819,322 million SLC 797,306 million SLC United Republic of Tanzania
2010s 61,931 million SLC 1.17 million million SLC 1.11 million million SLC United Republic of Tanzania
2020s 149,429 million SLC 1.53 million million SLC 1.38 million million SLC United Republic of Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher credit to agriculture and forestry — value standard local currency, Nepal or United Republic of Tanzania?
United Republic of Tanzania, at 1.53 million million SLC against 215,334 million SLC in Nepal as of 2020.
What is the difference in credit to agriculture and forestry — value standard local currency between Nepal and United Republic of Tanzania?
1.31 million million SLC, with United Republic of Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and United Republic of Tanzania?
12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
How do Nepal and United Republic of Tanzania rank globally for credit to agriculture and forestry — value standard local currency?
Nepal ranks 4th and United Republic of Tanzania ranks 1st of 25 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nepal vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-and-forestry-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/nepal/united-republic-of-tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/credit-to-agriculture-and-forestry-value-standard-local-currency-2015-prices/nepal/united-republic-of-tanzania/">Nepal vs United Republic of Tanzania: Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value Standard Local Currency</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value Standard Local Currency, 2015 prices
Unit
million SLC
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
27 places, 558 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.