Ecuador vs Suriname: Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value Standard Local Currency
Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value Standard Local Currency over time
- Ecuador
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 147 million SLC against 79.8 million SLC in Ecuador, a difference of 67.2 million SLC.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.8 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Suriname ahead.
Ecuador ranks 25th and Suriname ranks 24th of 25 countries.
Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.55 million SLC | 70.35 million SLC | 57.8 million SLC | Suriname |
| 2010s | 57.67 million SLC | 82.28 million SLC | 24.61 million SLC | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher credit to agriculture and forestry — value standard local currency, Ecuador or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 147 million SLC against 79.8 million SLC in Ecuador as of 2019.
- What is the difference in credit to agriculture and forestry — value standard local currency between Ecuador and Suriname?
- 67.2 million SLC, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Suriname?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
- How do Ecuador and Suriname rank globally for credit to agriculture and forestry — value standard local currency?
- Ecuador ranks 25th and Suriname ranks 24th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value Standard Local Currency. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.