Albania vs Ecuador: Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value US$
Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value US$ over time
- Albania
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 79.8 million USD against 56.21 million USD in Albania, a difference of 23.59 million USD.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.4 times Albania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Albania ahead.
Albania ranks 21st and Ecuador ranks 19th of 25 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Albania averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Albania | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 32.68 million USD | 12.55 million USD | 20.13 million USD | Albania |
| 2010s | 53.71 million USD | 57.67 million USD | 3.96 million USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher credit to agriculture and forestry — value us$, Albania or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at 79.8 million USD against 56.21 million USD in Albania as of 2014.
- What is the difference in credit to agriculture and forestry — value us$ between Albania and Ecuador?
- 23.59 million USD, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Ecuador?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
- How do Albania and Ecuador rank globally for credit to agriculture and forestry — value us$?
- Albania ranks 21st and Ecuador ranks 19th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.