Argentina vs Czechia: Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value US$
Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value US$ over time
- Argentina
- Czechia
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 2,734 million USD against 2,623 million USD in Argentina, a difference of 111 million USD.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 10th and Czechia ranks 8th of 25 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4,556 million USD | 1,799 million USD | 2,756 million USD | Argentina |
| 2010s | 8,278 million USD | 2,240 million USD | 6,037 million USD | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher credit to agriculture and forestry — value us$, Argentina or Czechia?
- Czechia, at 2,734 million USD against 2,623 million USD in Argentina as of 2018.
- What is the difference in credit to agriculture and forestry — value us$ between Argentina and Czechia?
- 111 million USD, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Czechia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Argentina and Czechia rank globally for credit to agriculture and forestry — value us$?
- Argentina ranks 10th and Czechia ranks 8th of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.