Ecuador vs Suriname: Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value US$
Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value US$ over time
- Ecuador
- Suriname
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 79.8 million USD against 19.71 million USD in Suriname, a difference of 60.09 million USD.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 4.0 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Suriname ahead.
Ecuador ranks 19th and Suriname ranks 22nd of 25 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 12.55 million USD | 25.63 million USD | 13.08 million USD | Suriname |
| 2010s | 57.67 million USD | 25.93 million USD | 31.74 million USD | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher credit to agriculture and forestry — value us$, Ecuador or Suriname?
- Ecuador, at 79.8 million USD against 19.71 million USD in Suriname as of 2014.
- What is the difference in credit to agriculture and forestry — value us$ between Ecuador and Suriname?
- 60.09 million USD, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Suriname?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2014.
- How do Ecuador and Suriname rank globally for credit to agriculture and forestry — value us$?
- Ecuador ranks 19th and Suriname ranks 22nd of 25 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Credit to Agriculture and Forestry — Value US$. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Credit to agriculture measures the amount of loans and advances given by the banking sector to farmers, rural households, agricultural cooperatives, or any other agri-related businesses. Each country’s central bank compiles its credit stocks by economic activities as part of its monetary and financial statistics publications via annual or quarterly reports online. Data collection has been carried out mostly through reports found on the central bank websites. Data are collected and compiled according to the International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities (ISIC Rev. 4: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/classifications/Econ/isic) with a special concentration on the credit to agriculture, forestry and fishing sector separately from the ones to manufacturing and services.